The Editorial Board, in the interests of the journal, will prior order an article on certain issues to some authors.

The articles presented by the authors will be submitted to the Journal Board for the review if the article is compatible with the journal requirements and basic principles.
All the articles received in the Editorial Office for publication, will be sent to two reviewers whose identity is anonymous for the author of the article in both cases whether the article is published or not.

As a reviewer may be selected any specialist (holder of, not less than, the scientific degree of Magister), of the relevant field including a member of the Editorial Board of the journal, based on the prior verbal consent. In case of negative reviews received from reviewers, the article will not be published. If one review is negative and the other positive, the editor-in-chief will decide to publish the article via the consultation with the Editorial Board and the Board members.

The article will be evaluated by a 100-point system.
The following criteria will be used for evaluation:
1.Content (maximum 20 points)
Check out: Actuality of the problem posed;
2. Depth of analysis and research argumentation (20 points)
Check out: Deep and thorough study of the issue by the author. Accuracy, concreteness, complexity of the argumentation, and the correspondence of scientific literature with the study topic.
3. Data credibility (maximum 20 points).
Check out: the accuracy of the data, how correctly the author is based on the data of the specified literature. Whether all cited sources in the bibliography of the work are referredcorrectly.
4. Structure (maximum 20 points)
Check out: whether the article is properly organized and the written style and language is acceptable.
5. Results: (maximum 20 points)
Whether the issues discussed in this article are novel or important.

Familiarization with the results: The review must be available for the author (in anonymous form). Each review will be considered positive if the overall rating is more than 50 points.
The expediency of publication of the positively evaluated articles and their placement in the issues of the journal and in the rubric of each issue is decided by the editor-in-chief via the consultation with the Editorial Board members.